PoliticsVIDEO

US Justice Department opens antitrust investigation into five TV networks

The department is examining whether ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC and Fox News violated competition law by suspending White House pool coverage of President Trump.

11 Oct 2026, 06:44 UTC3 min read4 Sources
PLAIN. CLIP

Key facts

  • The Justice Department is investigating ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC and Fox News over their suspension of White House pool coverage of President Trump.
  • A department spokesperson said group boycotts among commercial competitors can violate the Sherman Act, an antitrust law.
  • The five networks paused presidential coverage on September 21 after the White House barred CNN, MS NOW and Politico, DW reported.
  • The White House reinstated the credentials on September 24 after US District Judge Timothy Kelly ruled the ban was likely unconstitutional, Al Jazeera reported.
  • The networks did not immediately comment on the announcement, Al Jazeera reported.

The US Department of Justice has said it is investigating five television networks over whether they broke federal competition laws when they suspended pool coverage of President Donald Trump. The networks are ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC and Fox News, Justice Department spokesperson Emily Covington said. "The Antitrust Division is simply investigating to determine whether these news organizations have violated the antitrust laws," Covington said. The New York Times reported the networks were notified on Friday.

Covington said group boycotts among commercial competitors can violate the Sherman Act, a law that bars companies from engaging in monopolistic business practices. The Justice Department asked the networks to hand over communications related to the pool, the BBC reported. Al Jazeera reported the networks did not immediately comment on the announcement.

The White House barred CNN, MS NOW and Politico in September after Trump accused the organisations of writing "fiction or lies" about his team, according to the BBC. The White House said on September 19 that covering the president was a "privilege – not a right", Al Jazeera reported. On September 21, the five broadcasters that make up the primary White House television pool stopped presidential coverage in protest and refused to provide replacement coverage, DW reported. The outlets sued the administration, alleging the exclusions violated the First Amendment, which protects freedom of the press, and that the White House was retaliating over their coverage.

The White House reinstated the credentials on September 24 after US District Judge Timothy Kelly ruled the ban was likely unconstitutional and ordered the administration to "immediately return, reinstate, and restore" their access, Al Jazeera reported. Disputes over access to specific presidential events and pool assignments continued, according to Al Jazeera.

Jose Zamora, the Committee to Protect Journalists' regional director of the Americas, said on X that the government should not use antitrust investigations to intimidate news outlets defending press access. "The public's right to know depends on that access," Zamora said.

Al Jazeera reported the investigation is the latest in a series of clashes between the Trump administration and major news organisations. Trump has repeatedly called the mainstream media "fake news", according to Al Jazeera and DW. In February, the administration moved to bar Associated Press reporters and photographers from limited-access spaces such as the Oval Office because the outlet used "Gulf of Mexico" instead of "Gulf of America", the BBC reported. AP filed a lawsuit and the case remains ongoing, according to the BBC.

Context

The White House press pool is a rotating group of outlets that cover the president and accompany him on official duties. The five-network television pool shares the costs of covering the president, takes turns organising coverage and shares footage with outlets around the country. In February, the White House announced it was taking control of the pool, which the BBC reported had been managed by the White House Correspondents' Association for more than a century.

How outlets headlined it

How this was made

Compiled by our AI newsroom from 4 independent outlets, checked by a separate AI editor against the sources. Only claims found in the sources are reported. Spot an error? Every source is linked below.

Reader Discussion & Community Notes

● Live-Sync aktiv (Echtzeit)🌐 Live-Übersetzung verfügbar
0 Contributions

Open reader debate: Factual contributions and additions are synchronized directly in real time across all readers.

Loading contributions from cloud server…